I now know that I am not meant to find or feel love, peace, or sanctuary on this Earth. This is because God knows that the pain the Devil inflicts on me on this Earth will only sharpen the judicial and evidentiary blade that I deploy against evil within the Iowa Supreme Court.
I live to serve the Lord My God. Everything is as God wills it.
Subj: Freedom of Information Request (5 U.S.C. § 552)/SITREP
1. I am respectfully requesting a status update on my Freedom of Information Request (5 U.S.C. § 552) dated 05 SEP 2025.
2. Additionally I am requesting the personnel name, electronic mail address, and USPS mailing address for all Military Sexual Trauma Coordinators within the following:
Thursday, September 25 ? 9:00 – 9:30 AM Dennis, Susan Diane/515-699-5807 – Mental Health
Thursday, September 25 ? 9:30 – 10:30 AM Royston, Clint Patrick/515-699-5999 – Mental Health
The evidence indicates that I never received a telehealth link to attend these appointments. It is my understanding these are generally sent out the day before scheduled appointments. I went to the Marshalltown CBOC today and asked for assistance correcting this anomaly and I was told by the receptionist with brown hair in the middle desk that she had no access to correct this and that I had to call the Des Moines, IA VA. I informed her that I do not currently have a phone and I asked if I could call the Des Moines, IA, VA at their location and I was told that was not possible.
Due to these circumstances I am requesting the following:
1. Electronic mail correspondence including a telehealth link to attend these appointments, or
2. The rescheduling of these appointments including the implementation of telehealth because I do not have a car to travel to these appointments.
These appointments were transferred to the Des Moines, IA, VA Medical Center, Building 6M, due to the evidence of the alleged failure of the Marshalltown, IA CBOC mental health personnel to treat and properly diagnose service-connected mental health disabilities. This failure led to two six-week inpatient treatment events in 2023 and 2025.
During these events, personnel at the Des Moines, IA, VA Medical Center DOM documented previously undocumented post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in 2023 and military sexual trauma (MST) in 2025. At the same time, the professional and compassionate personnel at Des Moines, IA, VA Medical Center DOM corrected and removed the improper diagnosis of a Cluster B Personality Disorder.
In my future complaint to the United States Department of Veterans Affairs and the United States Department of Justice Civil Rights Division, I will be providing a declaratory thesis supported by historical evidence and the DSM-5-TR (5th Edition, Text Revision). This thesis will provide a reasonable conclusion that the Department of Veterans Affairs negligently and improperly diagnosed a twenty-year United States Navy Veteran—with over a decade of Department of Defense mental health tracking—with a Cluster B Personality Disorder, despite zero medical record evidence of such an issue.
I believe the evidence will support a reasonable conclusion that this negligent and improper diagnosis, made by female VA mental health professionals who failed to properly identify military sexual trauma (MST) affecting a male victim, overlooked the trauma symptoms that in fact pointed to an MST/PTSD diagnosis. The basis for this alleged improper and negligent psychiatric diagnosis was not the Veteran’s documented United States Department of Defense historical mental health records or behavioral patterns, but rather a systemic failure to properly identify MST trauma symptoms. The historical events documented within this case provide evidence supporting there could be many more male Veterans suffering from these symptoms in the post-#MeToo era that the United States Department of Veterans Affairs has possibly failed to provide proper and equal access to health care.
The Form of the Salem Witch Trial Theorem and the Circumvention of American Justice
As we reflect on the historical events and publicly documented evidence from the height of the social “#MeToo Movement” (see me too international), we must ask as a nation:
Was this movement, including alleged victims of sexual abuse, rooted in due process and proper American justice? Or did it, in some instances, manifest as crowd-sourced cyberbullying on social media platforms, organized by what evidence now reveals were actual assailants targeting malicious and heinous attacks through the hashtag #MeToo, that targeted male citizens for personal or legal leverage?
The Federal Bureau of Investigation has noted the existence of false allegations of adult crimes (see FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin), and historical evidence shows that some #MeToo-era accusations were later challenged in court, where accusers were found to have presented no supporting evidence. At the same time, court records demonstrate that allegations of sexual abuse were deployed by a #MeToo supporter (Claudia J. Bergman f.k.a Claudia J. Merritt a.k.a Claudia J. Alatorre) in the immediate aftermath of legal separation for what evidence now shows was personal and strategic gain (see San Diego East County Superior Court Case ED100465, 16 SEP 2021).
(Note: The originator of this correspondence was a pro se party in San Diego East County Superior Court case ED100465, following the dismissal of legal counsel who had sought a nondisclosure agreement (NDA). The NDA was later abandoned after the availability of additional evidence supporting attorney misconduct delayed the release of attorney work-product records.)
The Form of Crush Depth
It is unfortunate that after serving the rights and liberties of others, we live in a world where the honorable men and women of the United States Armed Forces are required to defend their families and their own rights and liberties against those the historical record shows they have spent their entire lives serving.
Standing the watch in the defense of others is all that I know how to do. I have never witnessed or known defeat because I have never stopped working until I have reached the threshold of success and mission completion.
I am unmoved, uninspired, and undeterred from the evidence of disregard, discrimination, criminalization, corruption, and unethical and alleged criminal conduct I have experienced while standing this watch. It is nothing more to me than seasoning within a meal I will ultimately lawfully serve the country that I served for the benefit of others.
The depths of severe depression are not something we need to fear. They are moments of darkness through which the Light of God will faithfully lead us. Panic does not reflect a true situation report (SITREP), but only the lies spun by the Adversary in his attempt to bring defeat.
Honor, Courage, and Commitment demand that we never give up the ship, nor forsake our country, no matter how deep into the darkness of the ocean’s abyss evil seeks to consume us.
USPS Distribution:
Me Too International
245 North Highland Avenue
Suite 230 #808
Atlanta, GA 30307
“The study of ethics is a pursuit of understanding the philosophical nature of right and wrong in its most perfect form. A society’s justice system is an ever-evolving pursuit of that perfection. Corruption is the cultural, political, or personal bias that overrules and interferes with that system.” Perfection, Flaws, and Corruption
Legal Disclaimer: Phoenix Harbor (2025-00002034) is a registered trade name in Marshall County, IA.
Government Entity Involved: Iowa Attorney General’s Office
Alleged Violation: Iowa Code Chapter 22
Other Persons with Information: All State of Iowa recipients of this email, including members of the Iowa press (excluding U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs personnel), as reflected in the State of Iowa’s email public records and my investigative files. Many of these individuals have been routinely updated on this matter since 2019.
Description of Alleged Violation: Failure to release an email public record, including the email address of Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird. This record was sought in connection with a request for emails showing the Iowa Attorney General’s Office’s involvement in actions by former IPIB Executive Director Erika Eckley. The correspondence in question relates to alleged violations of Iowa Code Chapter 216, involving the Iowa Department of Public Safety, the Office of the Chief Information Officer, and the Iowa Attorney General’s Office. The matter also concerns former Deputy Attorney General and IPIB Chair Julie Pottorff (See: https://io.phoenixharbor.net/public/grid/OD960dOh8sc-aKmQXAfSLmFuIXU4JNn0fEUZK4xT0po), and numerous entities involved in representing government interests.
Below is documentation regarding the State of Iowa’s relocation of a former Iowa Public Information Board Executive Director and the changes made to her official contact email account. Historical records and public reporting suggest these changes may be linked to prior conduct concerns stored and preserved in the former executive director’s previous email account. These materials are being prepared for submission to the Iowa Judicial Branch and federal regulators.
Evidence regarding Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird’s handling of testimony and evidence related to the alleged interstate concealment of two children, who, as documented, were concealed from court-ordered appearances in San Diego East County Superior Court Case No. ED100465 and thereby prevented from providing testimony involving allegations of sexual abuse. At the same time, they were concealed in Ames, Iowa by Iowa State University Reiman Gardens Education Director Sara Merritt. Nearly 1,000 pages of public records show that Sara Merritt, at the time, coordinated field trips for State of Iowa public school children to visit Iowa State University’s Reiman Gardens.
Ames Community School District in Ames, Iowa, maintains educational records showing that Sara Merritt enrolled my children in the district at the same time they were under court order to provide testimony regarding alleged sexual abuse reported by Claudia J. Bergman (f.k.a. Claudia J. Merritt, a.k.a. Claudia J. Alatorre) in San Diego East County Superior Court Case No. ED100465. Evidence indicates that Claudia J. Bergman, Sara N. Merritt, and Matthew E. Merritt coordinated the concealment of my children across the states of California, Iowa, and Montana. At that time, neither Matthew E. Merritt nor Sara N. Merritt possessed any court documents authorizing the out-of-state transfer of my children or the unauthorized custody they recorded on Ames Community School District registration forms.
It is my belief that a reasonable conclusion can be drawn that the State of Iowa’s repeated attempts to criminalize me directly correlate with its possible desire to discredit my investigation, protect institutional credibility (related to these events and subsequent public records requests and complaints), and conceal evidence showing that taxpayer dollars were used to fund the education of two students whom Ames Community School District registered without properly verifying authorized custody. At the same time, evidence indicates that their minors’ counselor, Meredith Levin (#226437), did not know where her clients were located or who had custody of them.
The evidence revealing the true form and ethics of Iowa’s leadership is shown not only in its attempts to criminalize me for pursuing the Truth in the Light of God, but also in overwhelming proof of municipal, county, and state inaction. The record demonstrates deliberate disregard and complete failure over years of events.
I believe the evidence showing Governor Kim Reynolds’ indirect handling of these matters, through her historical non-responses to public records requests and through the subsequent complaints related to records requests seeking data about these events that were submitted to state officials she appointed and which the evidence shows were ignored or improperly dismissed, is consistent with her public act of kissing a politician on stage who was implicated in the very conduct described in the referenced news articles (see Reference 19).
It is not logical to expect Attorney General Brenna Bird to protect children from what the evidence shows was interstate concealment and sexual abuse when the record also shows she traveled to New York to stand beside a man whom the Associated Press reported was found liable for sexual abuse in civil court (see Reference 8). At the same time, the evidence shows she supports a President with questionable ties to individuals and organizations that evidence indicates are involved in the sexual exploitation of children.
The Sailor’s Creed
I am a United States Sailor.
I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America and I will obey the orders of those appointed over me.
I represent the fighting spirit of the Navy and those who have gone before me to defend freedom and democracy around the world.
I proudly serve my country’s Navy combat team with Honor, Courage and Commitment.
I am committed to excellence and the fair treatment of all.
The sum of my work in this investigation has little to do with my military training, my education, or my obsessive-compulsive disorder. It has everything to do with Jesus Christ carrying me during moments when I wanted to give up while revealing a glowing thumb drive in darkness containing the Truth that was believed to have been lost.
“The Law came in so that the offense would increase; but where sin increased, grace abounded all the more,“
“The study of ethics is a pursuit of understanding the philosophical nature of right and wrong in its most perfect form. A society’s justice system is an ever-evolving pursuit of that perfection. Corruption is the cultural, political, or personal bias that overrules and interferes with that system.” Perfection, Flaws, and Corruption
Legal Disclaimer:Cipher Hunter (2025-00002035) is a registered trade name in Marshall County, IA. Cipher Hunter is a division within the Phoenix Harbor network of web properties.
This correspondence does not communicate, imply, or endorse any past, present, or future violation of the United States Code or the Iowa Code. It is submitted solely for the lawful purpose of documenting the lived experience of injustice and respectfully demanding adherence to our laws and the ethical standards and disciplinary procedures set forth by the Iowa Judicial Branch pursuant to Iowa Court Rules.
The section “The Sailor’s Creed” includes the United States Navy Sailor’s Creed including the very definition of honor, courage, and commitment to duty. The included video’s intent is to communicate a creative allegory supporting this creed and promise to the American people that no matter how dark the night becomes at sea or how many days have passed without fair winds and following seas we will stand this watch until every order is executed and every lawful act is completed until the completion of our mission and deployment.
This correspondence contains expressions of public sentiment and a redress of grievances protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America and by Article I, §§ 1, 2, and 7 of the Constitution of the State of Iowa.
Good morning I appreciate your time in reading this correspondence. The events and difficulties I have navigated within the State of Iowa since retiring from the United States Navy that have manifested the path I am on and the condition that I currently find myself in are irrelevant. Personal deficiencies that manifest within our lives while trying to navigate adversity and crisis can either be met with excuses or productive solutions that will produce logical, ethical, and lawful resolution. I retired from the United States Navy in 2017. My state taxes from 2017–2020 while I was investigating the concealment of my children across the states of California, Iowa (Ames), and Montana were filed improperly and failed to protect my rights and liberties granted by the State of Iowa legislature pursuant to Iowa Code § 422.7(20)(a) (see all Senate File 303 (85th General Assembly, 2014).
From 2020 – 2024 I managed life variables that crippled my ability to optimally and proficiently maintain scheduled operational life events leading to the delinquency of my 2021 – 2024 annual tax returns while improperly calculated balances filed between 2017 – 2020 accumulated interest and penalties. At the same time, as the historical record shows I have only accumulated approximately $15,000 – $20,000 of taxable income between 2017 and 2022. Furthermore, my understanding of Iowa Code § 422.13 and Iowa Code § 422.7(20)(a)indicates that I have not had a legal requirement to file a tax return in the State of Iowa since 2023. During the summer of 2025 prior to the State of Iowa’s transmission of Letter ID: L0007388127 I completed my legal requirement regarding filing my state returns for 2021 and 2022 and it is my understanding that my return that was within statute was applied to my balance that accumulated during 2017 – 2020.
In late August I set up a payment arrangement with the Iowa Department of Revenue for the balance shown in Letter ID: L0007388127 and I purchased a money order to complete my 01 SEP 2025 payment. At the same time, the evidence I have indicates the State of Iowa Department of Revenue failed to send correspondence confirming the payment arrangement nor did it provide correspondence including a payment stub confirming the amount due on 01 SEP 2025 and which office within the Iowa Department of Revenue (i.e. main office, collections office, etc.) to send the payment. Due to current circumstances I have cashed the money order I had purchased to send to the Iowa Department of Revenue so that I have money for food. I have invested everything that I have in the work that I do and I will not abandon it until it reaches a logical and lawful conclusion.
I feel zero grief or guilt regarding these events. My state and federal tax filings from 1997–2017, prior to moving back to Iowa after honorably retiring from the United States Navy, provide no evidence of a similar pattern of delinquency. My historical record shows consistency, supporting the conclusion that issues after 2017 arose from external variables, not neglect. This provides evidence supporting a reasonable conclusion that the current state of my tax balance possibly has more to do with the dynamics and variables I have been forced to navigate regarding evidence supporting municipal, county, state, and federal negligence and misconduct that I have endured from 2017 – 2025 that has significantly impacted my health and ability to pursue life and liberty in accordance with the constitutions of the State of Iowa and the United States of America. Regardless, these related tax matters require resolving and I am currently in the process of accommodating this legal requirement.
Plan of Action
2023 Federal Income Tax Return will be filed before 30 SEP 2025 as I instructed my H&R Tax preparer at 204 E Linn St Ste C, Marshalltown, IA 50158 during June/July of 2025.
2024 Federal Income Tax Return will be filed before 30 SEP 2025 as I instructed my H&R Tax preparer at 204 E Linn St Ste C, Marshalltown, IA 50158 during June/July of 2025.
2017 – 2020 State of Iowa amended tax returns will be filed before 31 OCT 2025 which should neutralize my entire documented delinquent tax liability shown in Letter ID: L0007388127.
Strategic and Tactical Context
As the historical evidence shows I have experienced nothing more from the leadership of the State of Iowa, Jasper County, IA, the City of Newton, IA, and the City of Marshalltown, IA, than its failure to protect my children and I from documented domestic abuse (City of Newton, IA, Jasper County, IA), service connectable military sexual trauma (City of Newton, IA, Jasper County, IA), the persecution, criminalization, and discrimination of my service-connected mental health disabilities (State of Iowa, Iowa Attorney General’s Office, Iowa Department of Public Safety, Iowa Public Information Board, Iowa Civil Rights Commission, City of Marshalltown, IA), concealment of public records related to these events (State of Iowa, Jasper County, IA, City of Newton, IA, Marshalltown, IA, Ames, IA, Iowa Public Information Board, etc.), nearly half a million in fraud while preventing access to public records (City of Marshalltown,IA), and evidence supporting a strategic and purposeful action by the Iowa Judicial Branch to minimize and suppress evidence of state-wide attorney misconduct since 2012 which I will be presenting to state and federal officials in the upcoming weeks.
My retirement benefits post into my Paypal account at the end of every month. My account and routing information are available to the State of Iowa immediately upon request should it determine to follow through with the levy articulated in Letter ID: L0007388127. I respectfully submit the following to the leadership of the State of Iowa: If the leadership of the State of Iowa intends to pursue a levy, let that action stand as a public admission and evidence supporting its hypocrisy: enforcing the law selectively against a retired U.S. Navy veteran while documented failures to uphold the law as the evidence supports that I have provided the elected and appointed leadership of the State of Iowa remain ignored and unaddressed. I will continue to lawfully investigate the elected and appointed leadership of this state and their alleged failure to manifest and adhere to our laws to protect the lives of others from being impacted as the evidence shows my family’s lives were. Let’s see where we both stand when the dust settles.
The Marshall County, IA Recorder can be reached at: Nan Benson Auditor/Recorder 1 E Main St Marshalltown, IA 50158 Phone: 641-754-6323 nbenson@marshallcountyia.gov
The Form of the Pyrewolf In The Light of the Wolf Moon
When we take complete ownership and responsibility for the evidence of our historical conduct and the life events we encounter we seize control and operational risk management of variables that the Adversary may wish to exploit against us. At the same time, those who produce minimal evidence of adhering to our laws weaken their position within moral influence regarding being deserving of a position that provides them with the authority to enforce the law.
To lawfully dismantle the evil that seeks to destroy our nation all that is required is the honor, courage, and commitment to lead the evidence of its historical misconduct into a collision course with its current trajectory.
Never fear the Adversary; lead it to its lawful conclusion.
“The study of ethics is a pursuit of understanding the philosophical nature of right and wrong in its most perfect form. A society’s justice system is an ever-evolving pursuit of that perfection. Corruption is the cultural, political, or personal bias that overrules and interferes with that system.” Perfection, Flaws, and Corruption
Legal Disclaimer:Phoenix Harbor (2025-00002034) is a registered trade name in Marshall County, IA.
Good afternoon, Ma’am. I am preparing correspondence to the Secretary of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs, the Honorable Doug Collins, regarding my historical evidentiary record of experiences with the United States Department of Veterans Affairs. I am preparing letters of appreciation for the following personnel and requesting confirmation of spelling or full names:
Liz McNeil
Jackie (Last Name Unknown), DOM Mental Health Provider
Kendra Covington
The name of the Respiratory Therapist who has helped me with my CPAP use through years of degraded use due to worsening OCD symptoms
Health Background
I was in the emergency room on 24 AUG 2025 with pain in my upper right quadrant, and over the course of specifically the last year—and cumulatively the last few years—I have been feeling increasingly sick and fatigued.
I have taken time off from my investigative work to stabilize my health, including the following steps:
Implementation of a 30-Day Med Center with 4 daily alarms to track VA prescription medication use due to increased mental fog and problems focusing
Daily tracking of vitals to isolate symptoms of organic system failure
Construction of a database to track and automate life management processes to help improve my health while investigating government corruption that led to the collapse and destruction of my family for the purpose of protecting the lives of others
Experience with VA Care
I had an experience today with my VA primary care provider, Dr. Jensen of the Marshalltown CBOC, that left me emotionally distraught because it seemed very evident to me that she possessed no compassion or empathy for what I am going through, or cared about my attempt to explain the deterioration of my health in context with historical events.
I have experienced numerous events where VA health care providers have provided feedback that indicated a conclusion had been reached that I am damaging myself because I should just move on with my life. At the same time, these same individuals—who have family and friends—never expressed the same sentiment when I invested twenty years of my life defending their lives, in contrast to the last few years I have spent advocating for myself and the lives of others while providing a public record of evidence.
This evidence supports:
Gender-based discrimination related to military sexual trauma (MST) and domestic abuse (see Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act ? 42 U.S.C. § 18116 )
Sexual-orientation-based discrimination related to MST (see Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act ? 42 U.S.C. § 18116 )
Sexual-identity-based discrimination related to symptoms of MST (see Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act ? 42 U.S.C. § 18116)
Inconsistent care for heterosexual males with symptoms of MST compared to similar care provided to members of the LGBTQ+ community (see Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act ? 42 U.S.C. § 18116 )
Inconsistent provision and failure to provide health care and federal benefits based upon service-connected mental health-based discrimination (see Rehabilitation Act of 1973 ? 29 U.S.C. § 794 (Section 504))
State of Iowa–based discrimination, criminalization, and persecution of service-connected mental health disabilities (see Iowa Code Chapter 216) for what evidence indicates was desired strategic, tactical, civil, professional, or personal gain
Military Sexual Trauma (MST) Coordinator
I am also requesting the name of the female Des Moines VA Medical Center Military Sexual Trauma Coordinator who denied me health care because, in her words, I was not a victim of MST since there was no penetration. This was the conclusion she arrived at during a phone interview with me for indoctrination for care and health benefits.
I will be presenting an evidentiary record suggesting that this alleged institutional, cultural, and social bias manifests as a default stereotype or bias—indicating that sexual trauma is only recognized within protected classes that have been penetrated by what evidence suggests is an institutional and societal default assailant group that possesses something that may be used for penetration.
Investigative Work
I am in the final stages of finalizing my investigative work product for state and federal agencies documenting systemic and institutional misconduct and corruption, supported by evidence of the Iowa Judicial Branch’s procedural posture toward covering up evidence of attorney misconduct within the State of Iowa pursuant to changes made in 2012 to the Iowa Rules of the Court. I have also implemented a safety plan and lawful operational risk management contingencies in preparation for future evidence, supported by a historical record of public evidence of attorney misconduct (see Iowa Rules of the Court Chapter 32) that indicates the Iowa Judicial Branch and its licensed community’s default practice to preserve institutional integrity is the persecution, discrimination, and criminalization of lawful whistleblowers that the Iowa Judicial Branch and its licensed community have determined are civil and lawful threats to their chosen internal institutional posture and procedures.
The reason this is an ethics war to me is because:
I served this country for twenty years because I believe in what we as a people stand for.
When I returned home, my life—as the evidence shows—was persecuted, discriminated against, and criminalized.
This led to my interracial daughter being abandoned in an environment of white national supremacy, involving those who concealed her across three states, causing her to be homeless and the victim of being drugged and sexually assaulted.
I will be working with the State of Montana to collect public records documenting this for my complaint against Honorable Judge Miller and Honorable Judge Martin of San Diego East County Court with the California Judicial Council.
Freedom of Information Request (5 U.S.C. § 552)
1. All United States Department of Veterans Affairs internal training materials related to Military Sexual Trauma utilized from 2017–2025.
2. All United States Department of Veterans Affairs publicly published materials related to Military Sexual Trauma utilized from 2017–2025.
3. All United States Department of Veterans Affairs internal training materials related to Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) from 2017–2025.
4. All United States Department of Veterans Affairs publicly published materials related to Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) from 2017–2025.
Any fees (if required) to complete the processing of this freedom of information request are to be communicated and arranged with the records requester prior to the performance of this request. Any fees requested by the United States of America without evidence of prior coordination with the records requester regarding any fees claimed will be disregarded by the originator of this request.
Conclusion
You are a good person, Mrs. Covington. Never forget that the light, hope, and positivity that evidence shows you manifest across your professional career may be one of the few rays of light that keep those who are damaged on course in this life and this world. Thank you for your service. I am in the process of building a full org chart to facilitate my advancement into investigating the federal government and lawfully halting what evidence indicates has become a corrupt, unethical, discriminatory state and federal MAGA _____ show.
Please update my email address with the VA to the following:
“Since 2012, Iowa Court Rule 35.4 has given the director for attorney discipline the discretion not to open an investigation when the information provided by the complainant, “if true, would not constitute misconduct or incapacity, or if the complaint is facially frivolous, stale, lacking in adequate factual detail, duplicative, or outside the board’s jurisdiction, or does not otherwise reasonably warrant investigation.
In 2024, approximately 756 potential complaints were filed with the Board. The director exercised her discretion to decline to open investigations of at least 445 of them. Each potential complainant was notified of the decision not to investigate; many complainants chose to resubmit complaints with additional supporting documentation.”
The following public records request is being submitted to the Iowa Judicial Branch pursuant to Iowa Code § 22.4(2):
(a.) The Iowa Judicial Branch is requested to provide a copy of the 445 or more (“The director exercised her discretion to decline to open investigations of at least 445 of them”) complaints the Iowa Judicial Branch has publicly documented that, “The director exercised her discretion to decline to open…” Please produce the full text of each of the 445 or more declined complaints referenced in the 2024 Annual Report, including any written intake, dismissal, or explanatory documentation. This request does not presume or concede confidentiality under Iowa Code Chapter 22 and Iowa Code § 22.7, nor does it authorize the redaction or withholding of any record not explicitly protected by law and supported with a legal justification and burden-of-proof met by the agency. If any record is withheld in part or in full, the undersigned demands a written justification specifying the statutory basis, including the subsection invoked and the agency’s burden-bearing rationale for each withheld portion.
The purpose of this public records request is to collect data stored and preserved by the Iowa Judicial Branch pursuant to Iowa Code § 22.1(3)(a) for the purpose of building a public database showing all complaints the Iowa Judicial Branch chose to decline to open. The undersigned has documented evidence suggesting a possible paradigm exists that the Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board Director of Attorney Discipline and the Executive Director she reports to are complicit in attorney misconduct through manipulated procedural dismissals of complaints brought to their attention by the people of the State of Iowa. This request is made in the public interest and for non-commercial, civic accountability purposes.
(b.) The Iowa Judicial Branch is requested to provide the original complaint and investigative case file for the 2024 investigation and case against Brick Gentry, P.C. shareholder Matthew S. Brick. If any record is withheld in part or in full, the undersigned demands a written justification specifying the statutory basis, including the subsection invoked and the agency’s burden-bearing rationale for each withheld portion. The undersigned has documented evidence suggesting that Matthew S. Brick has committed the following acts, which support a forthcoming misconduct complaint that will be submitted during Q4 2025.
Misrepresentation of the Iowa Code and public records stored and preserved by the City of Newton, IA, while attempting to manipulate a third-party’s understanding of their rights.
False statement on court document unsupported by evidence.
Misrepresentation of facts during an Iowa Public Information Board case(s).
Concealment of records not protected by Iowa Code § 22.7 (public records) related to documented domestic abuse and military sexual trauma (MST).
The deployment of false allegations of criminal conduct and the restriction of rights and access to public accommodations while failing to present a case with evidence supporting these allegations before the Iowa Court.
Preliminary review indicates ongoing concern regarding possible misrepresentation of information system capabilities while fraudulently elevating costs (see Iowa Code § 22.3) and delaying and burdening a third-party’s request and right to access public records.
A response is respectfully requested within the time limits set by Iowa Code § 22.8.
3. ISCADB Complaint – Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board Director of Attorney Discipline Tara M. van Brederode
An ISCADB complaint against Tara M. van Brederode, Director of Attorney Discipline, will be submitted to the Iowa Judicial Branch by July 21, 2025, with documented evidence supporting violations of:
Iowa Court Rule 32:4.4(a) – “In representing a client, a lawyer shall not use means that have no substantial purpose other than to embarrass, delay, or burden a third person, or use methods of obtaining evidence that violate the legal rights of such a person.”
Iowa Court Rule 32:8.4(a) – “violate or attempt to violate the Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the acts of another;”
Iowa Court Rule 32:8.4(c) – “engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation;”
Iowa Court Rule 32:8.4(d) – “engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice;”
Iowa Court Rule 32:8.4(g) – “engage in sexual harassment or other unlawful discrimination in the practice of law or knowingly permit staff or agents subject to the lawyer’s direction and control to do so.”
4. The Form of Judicial Complicity and Passive Misconduct Within the Iowa Judicial Branch
An Iowa Judicial Branch judicial officer or licensed attorney’s silence or capitulation when facing evidence of another judicial officer or attorney’s misconduct or criminal acts (see Iowa Court Rules 32:8.3(a) and 32:8.4(d), conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, when a legal authority knowingly fails to act upon documented evidence of misconduct).
5. The Mercenary and the Idealist
To disarm a mercenary, you simply destroy their source of wealth. To destroy an idealist, you must have what it takes to destroy that man or woman. Otherwise, you would have been better served to never have set foot on the battlefield.
Respectfully,
Michael J. Merritt, USN (Ret.) Founder, Phoenix Harbor Writer/Musician ? 2510 S 6th St. D24 Marshalltown, IA 50158 ? (641) 387-9935 ?? pyrebird@phoenixharbor.net ? phoenixharbor.net
Legal Disclaimer:Phoenix Harbor (2025-00002034) is a registered trade name in Marshall County, IA.
This correspondence does not communicate, imply, or endorse any past, present, or future violation of the United States Code or the Iowa Code. It is submitted solely for the lawful purpose of documenting the lived experience of injustice and respectfully demanding adherence to the ethical standards and disciplinary procedures set forth by the Iowa Judicial Branch pursuant to the Iowa Rules of the Court. At the same time, the author utilizes creative writing allegories and United States military history to illustrate the evidence supporting the current internal social and political war for the spirit of America.
This correspondence contains expressions of public sentiment and a redress of grievances protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America and by Article I, §§ 1, 2, and 7 of the Constitution of the State of Iowa. The unethical within the Iowa Judicial Branch and its licensed community are respectfully requested to contact the following personnel regarding any future false allegations of criminal conduct supported by zero evidence:
Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board Director of Attorney Discipline Tara M. van Brederode:
1. Strategic and Tactical Introduction with Philosophical Framing
Thank you for your response. However, it appears that you are neither appropriately addressing these complaints nor recognizing the tactical and lawful persistence of the complainant.
The evidence indicates the Iowa Judicial Branch is not manifesting justice (truth) but is instead positioning itself for a philosophical war—one rooted in deception, institutional preservation, and the distortion of public conscience (see Sun Tzu, The Art of War, Section 1.18). Your response assumes you are dealing with an adversary operating from a victim mindset—someone who expects the state to manifest justice or provide ‘remedy’ (deception; see Sun Tzu, The Art of War, Section 4.15). The evidence suggests otherwise. In this case, the evidence indicates you are not properly addressing the nature of the adversary now filing these complaints with your office, nor do you appear to understand the complainant’s strategic or jurisprudential objectives (see Sun Tzu, The Art of War, Section 3.18). I am not seeking remedy from the state, nor does the evidence suggest you are dealing with a party operating from a position of victimhood.
Your response is legally insufficient and constitutes misrepresentation under Rule § 32:8.4(c) by falsely framing the role of the Attorney Disciplinary Board as remedy-based rather than accountability-driven. This framing is not only inaccurate—it misleads the public and misstates the board’s ethical mandate. In your response, you stated, “It is important that you understand that the Attorney Disciplinary Board does not have jurisdiction to grant you any personal remedy. The Board is also unable to address alleged violations of your constitutional rights.” Under such logic, if a woman were to submit a complaint citing attorney sexual harassment, the evidence suggests this Board would abdicate its disciplinary duties under Rule 32:8.4(g) while hiding behind ‘no personal remedy’ claims and redirecting institutional burden onto the victim, repeating boilerplate language: “It is important that you understand that the Attorney Disciplinary Board does not have jurisdiction to grant you any personal remedy. The Board is also unable to address alleged violations of your constitutional rights.” Does this Board not bear an ethical and legal responsibility—under Iowa Court Rules Chapters 32 and 35—to discipline attorney misconduct, regardless of whether civil remedy is concurrently sought through the courts?
Your response was nothing more than gaslighting—a mendacious form of discursive engineering, crafted to diminish the gravity of my complaint and deflect focus away from the Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board’s obligation to investigate attorney misconduct.
The Iowa Supreme Court’s refusal to process these complaints—based on the assertion this board does not provide ‘personal remedy’—amounts to calculated obfuscation. This court is actively redirecting public attention away from its responsibility to hold members of its licensed legal community accountable under Iowa Rules of the Court, Chapter 32, despite clear and documented evidence of professional misconduct. I believe this court enables misconduct because it refuses to properly investigate the violations documented in these complaints—allowing criminal acts and discrimination by licensed legal professionals to go unchallenged.
The evidence supporting the Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board’s failure to enforce its own ethical code is, by definition, prejudicial to the administration of justice under Iowa Rule 32:8.4(d). The burden of accountability does not disappear simply because the subject of a complaint is politically connected or legally licensed. On the contrary—that is when accountability matters most.
The Iowa Supreme Court may sweep these complaints under the judicial rug—but the evidence of misconduct will remain in the Iowa Judicial Branch (see Sun Tzu, The Art of War, Section 6.23). This refusal to investigate licensed professionals in the face of documented violations under Chapter 32 is not oversight—it is complicity. Ultimately, when I have finished filing complaints with this board, the Iowa Judicial Branch will either produce evidence of enforcing its own rules through the accountability of its licensed community—or confirm that Iowa’s elite are held to a different standard of accountability than the citizens over whom this court presides.
If a judicial branch produces evidence of systemic failure to hold its licensed community accountable for unethical conduct, how can it be trusted to administer justice within its courts?
I have not enjoyed the comfort of serving within a magnificent limestone building, resting on a foundation of sovereignty secured by others—where evidence shows the people’s understanding of truth is routinely manipulated, distorted by the pens of the esquire elite.
I have lived and served aboard warships—kept afloat not by misrepresentation, marble, or ceremony, but by the honor and integrity of those serving within the United States Navy. Where storms manifest the fury of God, decisions carry consequences, and honor and integrity are the only forces that separate life and liberty from a grave in the ocean’s abyss.
I do not fear the evil of this world, nor the power of this court or the State of Iowa’s law enforcement agencies—whose conduct, as the evidence shows, discriminates against and criminalizes the innocent. The only thing I fear is looking into the eyes of death without restoring my relationship with my children—or closing my eyes for the final time without being able to hold the hand of the woman I love.
Pulling the Iowa Judicial Branch Into the Light of God
I will be filing complaints with supporting evidence before this court, revealing the full extent of alleged attorney misconduct I have endured since 2019. These complaints, the accompanying evidentiary documentation, and this court’s dismissals or non-responses will also be submitted to the United States Department of Justice Civil Rights Division.
This forthcoming complaint—pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 12132 (ADA Title II)—against the State of Iowa and, specifically, the Iowa Judicial Branch, will include certified records from the United States Department of Veterans Affairs documenting an increase in my service-connected mental health disability rating from 50% to 70% during the year 2023.
At the same time this deterioration was formally recognized by the federal government, the evidence will indicate that Iowa Public Information Board Executive Director Erika Eckley and Jasper County, IA, Attorney Scott Nicholson repeatedly discriminated against and criminalized my service-connected mental health conditions on no fewer than four separate occasions throughout 2023 (see Iowa Code §§ 708.1(2)(a), 708.2(2), 708.7(1)(a)(4), and 718.6).
These actions by the Iowa Judicial Branch’s licensed community directly correlate with the United States Department of Veterans Affairs’ records, which authenticate that my condition was actively worsening—demonstrating a pattern of the State of Iowa’s willful disregard for both federal protections and basic human rights and dignity.
Judicial Ruins
When the masonry of a republic’s court has become compromised, it is only a matter of time before truth erodes its ability to stand. Authority and power that are not deployed with honor can only support the foundation of a civilization during a moment in time. Truth is eternal.
The Darkness Behind the Pillars of Justice
Obedience to the sum of the state’s failure to provide justice is not to show submission to it. Instead, it is to show evidence that the state stands on the wrong side of the law.
The truth will free the captives and provide sight to the blind.
Time will reveal Truth.
The Form of Politics and Perjury
Politics and perjury are similar because they both utilize a narrative encompassing words used to persuade an audience toward action while ignoring evidence of the truth.
Perfection, Flaws, and Corruption
The study of ethics is a pursuit of understanding the philosophical nature of right and wrong in its most perfect form. A society’s justice system is an ever-evolving pursuit of that perfection. Corruption is the cultural, political, or personal bias that overrules and interferes with that system.
The Form of the Iowa Judicial Branch’s Licensed Esquire Liar
A figure of licensed cowardice—an Esquire who conceals truth beneath a veil of authority.
One who simultaneously deploys misrepresentation, discrimination, or false allegations of criminal conduct against the innocent—not in pursuit of justice, but to advance a client’s social or political desires, or to shield themselves from the consequences of their own historical misconduct.
A judicial disease with no respect for the Iowa Rules of the Court—and perhaps, in moments of delusion, they even feel entitled to the cocaine they snort.
Revolutionary Courage
Without the ethical fabric of right and wrong, justice is nothing more than an evolutionary paradigm created by those with the power to define it. Once that paradigm has falsely defined the wrong person or group, it will be revolutionized.
The Form of the Legislative Code and the Rules of the Court
A legislative code or rules of the court does not lead to or manifest a paradigm of justice. It is simply a set of guidelines that govern a den of thieves.
3. The Form of the Office of the Attorney General for the State of Iowa
Below please find my completed ISCADB declarations concerning alleged violations of the Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct by:
Hard copies and completed ISCADB complaint forms will be submitted via USPS Priority Mail. All referenced evidence is publicly accessible at the following secure URL:
I believe the publicly available evidence concerning Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird symbolizes exactly what my investigation since 2019 has revealed: the Iowa Judicial Branch’s licensed community is, in large part, a culture of unethical, criminal sycophants—individuals who embrace, excuse, ignore, or dismiss evidence of misconduct and criminality because doing so preserves the false reality they believe they are entitled to.
Meanwhile, they destroy the lives and families of the least among us—leaving behind a long and damning trail of evidence. Evidence that reveals, with chilling clarity, what the Iowa Judicial Branch truly represents within its eroding and cracked limestone walls.
People may see me as unhinged or overly passionate—perhaps because they’ve never served anything beyond themselves for twenty years of their lives. They’ve never returned home to betrayal, persecution, criminalization, discrimination, and misguided hate.
They exist comfortably within the freedom provided by others—yet show no evidence of gratitude, no act of service, and no awareness of the cost paid by those who secured the freedom they now embrace and celebrate.
4. Philosophical and Judicial Forms
The Form of the Passive-Aggressive Judicial Death Penalty
As the evidence reflects, the Iowa Judicial Branch and its licensed community are entangled in alleged misconduct—acts that, at times, rise to the level of criminality, accompanied by a clear desire to conceal them through procedural dismissal.
It is increasingly evident that the sound of my voice unsettles this legal fraternity. But I respectfully submit:
Does this court and its licensed community have the courage to bury me beneath the ground—Or will this institution continue its slow execution, Gaslighting justice with persecution while hoping I drown?
The Form of Professionalism and Decorum
An illusion often manifested through a curated persona or fine clothing—deployed not to reflect truth, but to seduce society into mistaking presentation for virtue. It conceals the raw imperfection of our humanity beneath a polished veil of deception and status, shielding unethical conduct with the costume of respectability.
Honor is not preserved in presentation or fabric, but in the spiritual pursuit of Truth—and in the philosophical conscience that dares to manifest righteous acts.
The Form of Plato’s Cave
Deceit is a prison evil deploys to trap its audience while distorting their view of Truth. Deceit and corruption are evil’s answer to survivability regarding a person or institution that no longer exists in Truth. Those who require deceit to sustain themselves have already fallen and abandoned their people in darkness.
The Form of Betrayal
The state provides evidence of its true and proper form when the honorable that have served it execute orders and adhere to laws, while producing a sum that reveals the truth the state lacks the courage to face.
During these times, the honorable must hold on to and adhere to the spirit of the country they serve and ensure the actions of the dishonorable bounce off the sides of their hull. At the same time, they work to restore that which they served in accordance with our laws.
My heart is permanently lost at sea. At the same time, my soul has a firm grip on the ship’s wheel.
The Form of the Spiritual Martyr
I have been warned not to poke the bear. I have been advised to move on, to stay silent, and to stop challenging visible patterns of government corruption.
But regarding the authority this court may believe it holds to destroy my life on this Earth, I submit this truth with all due respect: My faith in Jesus Christ—and Iowa Code § 720.2—compels me to say, I do not give a damn.
I will gladly carry my cross to the top of the State of Iowa’s Golgotha if it means revealing the truth and protecting others from enduring the same losses my family and I have suffered.
The only true path to success in this life is faith in Jesus Christ—and the honor, courage, and commitment to pursue the truth, regardless of the lies, threats, and intimidation used by those who seek to corral and control us.
Death comes for us all. But life is only truly experienced by those who have the courage and persistence to stand in the light of God, no matter the cost…No matter the loss we sustain in this life.
The Form of the Veteran
We must defend not only the body—but also the spirit—of this republic throughout our lives, whether we are active or inactive in uniform. For even when we witness corruption within the government we once served, we did not defend that.
We defend the spirit of this republic—one that promises equal rights and “…the ability to [enjoy] and [defend] life and liberty; [acquire], [possess], and [protect] property; and [pursue] and [obtain] safety and happiness…” for all of God’s children. (Adapted from Iowa Const. art. I, § 1; tense adjusted for grammatical flow.)
When the very citizens we defended—and entrusted to uphold that promise—fail to do so, we must stand the watch once more. Not only to guard the philosophical conscience of this nation but to protect the lives of those who can no longer defend themselves.
I have served on every drop of water that sits on top of hell. I embrace the storms in this life because I know they will bring water from Heaven.
The Form of the Iowa Judicial Branch Duality
I am nothing more than a mirror—many wish not to have near, Reflecting what Iowa’s leaders truly fear. A reflection of evidence amassed through the years, Revealing too many as unethical profiteers.
A MAGA world that restores only the white, Concealing their conduct in the darkness of night. As they work to deport minorities out of sight, They only provide evidence of their racist plight.
As the people stare into their orange prophetic sign, I can see that many have already gone blind. As the people drink from the governor’s poisoned wine, I can see that many have already lost their mind.
When you dismantle false claims of stalkin’, And leave Scott Nicholson’s integrity walkin— This is what you say: “Sorry for Iowa Court Rockin’.” When you catch Erika Eckley discriminatively talkin’, and disability mockin— This is what you say: “Sorry for Iowa Court Rockin’.” When Scott Nicholson’s mid-election social media blockin’, when you’re in a public forum talkin— This is what you say: “Sorry for Iowa Court Rockin’.”
As the judicial branch minimizes its misconduct, It only provides evidence of how it earns a buck. As the unethical feast at their judicial potluck, They prove beyond a reasonable doubt, this court is ethically bankrupt.
A judicial brothel that sells out the rule of law, As its judicial officers deny the Truth that they saw. A branch entwined in the devil’s claw, That just flushed itself down a state park stall.
A state full of six-figure esquires, Who can’t handle their scandal in the mire— Or the high school grad they burned on their pyre. That was reborn in their unethical fire.
When you dismantle false claims of stalkin’, And leave Scott Nicholson’s integrity walkin— This is what you say: “Sorry for Iowa Court Rockin’.” When you catch Erika Eckley discriminatively talkin’, and disability mockin— This is what you say: “Sorry for Iowa Court Rockin’.” When Scott Nicholson’s mid-election social media blockin’, when you’re in a public forum talkin— This is what you say: “Sorry for Iowa Court Rockin’.”
As this court destroys the American family, while concealing evidence of its licensed brutality. It unethically works to reshape its formality, with a misrepresented form of prejudicial legality.
As the members of the Iowa Judicial Branch attend mass, And hide their sins behind stained glass, They only prove the verdict has come to pass— That this corrupt court will not last.
It is time for this court to get misconduct out of its head. If you want me quiet, give us liberty or make me dead. So here’s a sorry in advance, no hard feelings six-figure-rich.
Respectfully,
Michael J. Merritt, USN (Ret.) Founder, Phoenix Harbor Writer/Musician Information Warfare Specialist Information Systems Manager ? 2510 S 6th St. D24 Marshalltown, IA 50158 ? (641) 387-9935 ?? pyrebird@phoenixharbor.net ? phoenixharbor.net
“Tyranny breeds within government infrastructure that does not provide information with the same freedoms, rights, and liberties as the citizens who produced it.”
Legal Disclaimer:Cipher Hunter (2025-00002035) is a registered trade name in Marshall County, IA. Cipher Hunter is a division within the Phoenix Harbor network of web properties.
This correspondence does not communicate, imply, or endorse any past, present, or future violation of the United States Code or the Iowa Code. It is submitted solely for the lawful purpose of documenting the lived experience of injustice and respectfully demanding adherence to the ethical standards and disciplinary procedures set forth by the Iowa Judicial Branch pursuant to the Iowa Rules of the Court.
The phrase “If you want me quiet, give us liberty or make me dead” is a protected act of creative expression—referencing and adapting Patrick Henry’s speech to the Second Virginia Convention on March 23, 1775. This rhetorical device does not incite or endorse violence; rather, it raises a constitutionally protected question: if the Iowa Judicial Branch is willing to “decline” to process complaints that include evidence of licensed attorney misdemeanor conduct (see Iowa Code § 708.7(1)(a)(4)), would it also “decline” to process complaints that include evidence of felony conduct committed by licensed attorneys?
This correspondence contains expressions of public sentiment and a redress of grievances protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America and by Article I, §§ 1, 2, and 7 of the Constitution of the State of Iowa. The unethical within the Iowa Judicial Branch and its licensed community are respectfully requested to contact the following personnel regarding any future false allegations of criminal conduct supported by zero evidence:
DECLARATION AND EVIDENCE OF ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT — ATTORNEY GENERAL BRENNA BIRD
COMES NOW Pro Se Michael J. Merritt for Complainant Cipher Hunter, in this matter before the Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board. Respectfully requesting review of the below testimony and evidence in accordance with Iowa Rules of the Court Chapters 32 and 35.
I. PARTIES
Petitioner, Cipher Hunter, is a civic transparency and records research initiative focused on the protection of civil liberties and governmental accountability registered in Marshall County, Iowa, and managed by Michael J. Merritt. Mr. Merritt is a retired U.S. Navy veteran, information warfare specialist, and public records researcher. He is also an advocate for domestic violence survivors, individuals living with mental health disabilities, and veterans affected by military sexual trauma (MST).
Respondent Attorney General Brenna Bird is the Attorney General for the State of Iowa and Iowa’s chief legal officer.
II. CAUSE OF ACTION
Multiple alleged violations of the Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct stem from a unified sequence of factual events. To maintain legal sufficiency for each rule cited, overlapping facts appear where necessary to establish each violation in isolation.
32:8.4(d) — “engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice;” — Under the leadership of Attorney General Brenna Bird, the evidence supports that the Iowa Attorney General’s Office disregarded a public records request (See Attachment 4).
32:8.4(d) — “engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice;” — Under the leadership of Attorney General Brenna Bird, the evidence supports that the Iowa Attorney General’s Office disregarded a public records request related to evidence of the State of Iowa’s inter-agency acts of service-connected mental health disability discrimination (See Attachment 5).
32:8.4(d) — “engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice;” — Under the leadership of Attorney General Brenna Bird, the evidence supports that the Iowa Attorney General’s Office disregarded a public records request related to evidence supporting Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds’ office and Jasper County, IA’s disregard of a public records request submitted during 2024 pursuant to Iowa Code § 22.4(2) (See Attachment 6).
32:8.4(d) — “engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice;” — Under the leadership of Attorney General Brenna Bird, the evidence supports that the Iowa Attorney General’s Office disregarded a public records request related to evidence of the State of Iowa’s inter-agency acts of service-connected mental health disability discrimination (See Attachment 8).
32:3.4(a) — “unlawfully obstruct another party’s access to evidence or unlawfully alter, destroy, or conceal a document or other material having potential evidentiary value. A lawyer shall not counsel or assist another person to do any such act;” — Under the leadership of Attorney General Brenna Bird, the evidence supports that the Iowa Attorney General’s Office disregarded a public records request related to evidence of the State of Iowa’s inter-agency acts of service-connected mental health disability discrimination (See Attachment 5).
32:3.4(a) — “unlawfully obstruct another party’s access to evidence or unlawfully alter, destroy, or conceal a document or other material having potential evidentiary value. A lawyer shall not counsel or assist another person to do any such act;” — Under the leadership of Attorney General Brenna Bird, the evidence supports that the Iowa Attorney General’s Office disregarded a public records request related to evidence supporting Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds’ office and Jasper County, IA’s disregard of a public records request submitted during 2024 pursuant to Iowa Code § 22.4(2) (See Attachment 6).
32:3.4(a) — “unlawfully obstruct another party’s access to evidence or unlawfully alter, destroy, or conceal a document or other material having potential evidentiary value. A lawyer shall not counsel or assist another person to do any such act;” — Under the leadership of Attorney General Brenna Bird, the evidence supports that the Iowa Attorney General’s Office disregarded a public records request related to evidence of the State of Iowa’s inter-agency acts of service-connected mental health disability discrimination (See Attachment 8).
32:4.4(a) — “In representing a client, a lawyer shall not use means that have no substantial purpose other than to embarrass, delay, or burden a third person, or use methods of obtaining evidence that violate the legal rights of such a person.” — Under the leadership of Attorney General Brenna Bird, the evidence supports that the Iowa Attorney General’s Office disregarded a public records request (See Attachment 4).
32:4.4(a) — “In representing a client, a lawyer shall not use means that have no substantial purpose other than to embarrass, delay, or burden a third person, or use methods of obtaining evidence that violate the legal rights of such a person.” — Under the leadership of Attorney General Brenna Bird, the evidence supports that the Iowa Attorney General’s Office disregarded a public records request related to evidence of the State of Iowa’s inter-agency acts of service-connected mental health disability discrimination (See Attachment 5).
32:4.4(a) — “In representing a client, a lawyer shall not use means that have no substantial purpose other than to embarrass, delay, or burden a third person, or use methods of obtaining evidence that violate the legal rights of such a person.” — Under the leadership of Attorney General Brenna Bird, the evidence supports that the Iowa Attorney General’s Office disregarded a public records request related to evidence supporting Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds’ office and Jasper County, IA’s disregard of a public records request submitted during 2024 pursuant to Iowa Code § 22.4(2) (See Attachment 6).
32:4.4(a) — “In representing a client, a lawyer shall not use means that have no substantial purpose other than to embarrass, delay, or burden a third person, or use methods of obtaining evidence that violate the legal rights of such a person.” — Under the leadership of Attorney General Brenna Bird, the evidence supports that the Iowa Attorney General’s Office disregarded a public records request related to evidence of the State of Iowa’s inter-agency acts of service-connected mental health disability discrimination (See Attachment 8).
32:8.4(g) — “engage in sexual harassment or other unlawful discrimination in the practice of law or knowingly permit staff or agents subject to the lawyer’s direction and control to do so.” — Under the leadership of Attorney General Brenna Bird, the evidence supports that the Iowa Attorney General’s Office disregarded several public records requests related to evidence of the State of Iowa’s inter-agency acts of service-connected mental health disability discrimination (See Attachments 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8).
32:8.4(a) — “violate or attempt to violate the Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the acts of another;” — This complaint alleges Attorney General Brenna Bird has produced evidence supporting twelve individual violations of the Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct as supported by the testimony and evidence within this complaint. A final complaint will be submitted upon the completion of the Complainant’s statewide investigation and the conclusion of a future Iowa Court case against the Iowa Public Information Board.
The following section provides a factual timeline and documentation supporting the violations outlined above.
III. FACTS AND BACKGROUND
The following timeline of evidence supports the conclusion that Attorney General Brenna Bird violated sections of the Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct outlined in Section II of this complaint.
Timeline of Events
Each of the following events corresponds to a documented attachment and supports the foundation for the alleged Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct violations outlined in Section II.
09 NOV 2022 — Upon the Iowa Public Information Board tabling former Iowa Public Information Board Executive Director Johnson’s 11 OCT 2022 dismissal, it was determined that Facebook block lists “belonging to… any county….” are public records in the State of Iowa. (See Attachment 1, Memorandum — Iowa Public Information Board — Revised Dismissal — 09 NOV 2022).
11 AUG 2023 — Kristi Harshbarger of the Iowa State Association of Counties communicated to the Iowa Attorney General’s office, “Good afternoon: I talked to Erika Eckley with IPIB this afternoon. She received 35 complaints from Michael Merritt last night and so she is reaching out to us, the League, and IASB, as she would like to discuss this issue with her board next Thursday the 17th and is encouraging local governments that have concerns/ideas on how to handle Mr. Merritt’s requests to come speak at the public comment portion at the beginning of the meeting (meeting is at 1:00). I think she would like to try to get some guidance for local governments and is trying to strike a balance between Chapter 22 and the needs of local governments (resources, IT security, etc). I know both ICIT and ICAA have had some informal conversations among their members about these requests — if either of you are aware of counties that might like to comment at this meeting, could you please contact them or let me know who to contact? Thank you! Kristi” (See Electronic Mail — Iowa State Association of Counties — Kristi Harshbarger — 11 AUG 2023).
14 AUG 2023 — Cindy Glick of the Iowa Attorney General’s Office forwarded an email from Kristi Harshbarger to a Legislative Committee regarding an intercounty teleconference regarding public records requests submitted by the Complainant, “Hi—Here is the call-in info—Dial-in number: 877-304-9269 Conference Code: 664760# Thanks! Kristi” (See Electronic Mail — Iowa Attorney General’s Office — Cindy Glick — 14 AUG 2023).
22 JAN 2025 — Public records requests submitted pursuant to Iowa Code § 22.4(2) related to the Iowa Attorney General’s Facebook Page Block List (See Electronic Mail — Michael J Merritt — 22 JAN 2025).
31 JAN 2025 — Public records request submitted pursuant to Iowa Code § 22.4(2) requesting evidence of the Iowa Attorney General’s involvement in alleged discriminatory acts by IPIB Executive Director Erika Eckley’s alleged statewide discrimination against service-connected mental health-based disabilities (See Electronic Mail — Michael J Merritt — 31 JAN 2025; see also ISCADB Complaint — Erika Eckley — 25 JUN 2025).
05 JUN 2025 — Public records request submitted pursuant to Iowa Code § 22.4(2) requesting evidence of a statewide transmitted public records request that evidence indicates Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds and Jasper County, IA, disregarded during 2024 (See Electronic Mail — Michael J Merritt — 05 JUN 2025).
10 JUN 2025 — Iowa Office of Civil Rights issued a Right to Sue memorandum for Michael J. Merritt v. Iowa Public Information Board (See MM RTS).
12 JUN 2025 — Public records request sent to Daniel Barnes — Deputy Attorney General, Jeffrey Peterzalek — Deputy Attorney General, Edward Bull— Deputy Attorney General, Susan Krisko — Deputy Attorney General, Eric Wessan — Deputy Attorney General, Leif Olson — Deputy Attorney General, and Dan Breitbarth — Assistant Attorney General 3/Former Board, Commission, Council pursuant to Iowa Code § 22.4(2) requesting evidence of the Iowa Attorney General’s involvement in alleged discriminatory acts by IPIB Executive Director Erika Eckley’s alleged statewide discrimination against service-connected mental health-based disabilities (See Electronic Mail — Michael J Merritt — 12 JUN 2025).
13 JUN 2025 — Iowa Attorney General’s response to Attachment 8 (See Electronic Mail — Iowa Attorney General — 13 JUN 2025).
16 JUN 2025 — Complainant’s response to Attachment 9 (See Electronic Mail — Michael J Merritt — 16 JUN 2025).
06 JUL 2025 — Evidence supporting that Facebook Page “Office of the Attorney General of Iowa (Attorney General Brenna Bird)” (https://www.facebook.com/AGIowa/) is a Facebook Page belonging to the State of Iowa (See Screenshot — facebook-com-agiowa — 6-7-2025_15114).
06 JUL 2025 — Evidence supporting the official social media profiles for the Office of the Attorney General’s Office of the State of Iowa (See Screenshot — iowaattorneygeneral-gov — 6-7-2025_1508).
IV. ATTACHMENTS
Memorandum — Iowa Public Information Board — Revised Dismissal — 09 NOV 2022
Electronic Mail — Iowa State Association of Counties — Kristi Harshbarger — 11 AUG 2023
Electronic Mail — Iowa Attorney General’s Office — Cindy Glick — 14 AUG 2023
Electronic Mail — Michael J Merritt — 22 JAN 2025
Electronic Mail — Michael J Merritt — 31 JAN 2025
Electronic Mail — Michael J Merritt — 05 JUN 2025
MM RTS — 10 JUN 2025
Electronic Mail — Michael J Merritt — 12 JUN 2025
Electronic Mail — Iowa Attorney General — 13 JUN 2025
The evidence presented in this complaint supports multiple violations of the Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct. These violations are not hypothetical—they are grounded in public communications, official correspondence, and a clearly documented timeline. Attorney General Brenna Bird’s failure to release lawful public records pursuant to Iowa Code Chapter 22, combined with the evidence supporting the Attorney General’s Office’s role in inter-agency acts of disability-based discrimination, contributed to procedural obstruction, emotional harm, denial of rights, and violations of statutory protections under Iowa Code Chapters 22 and 216.
Taken together, this conduct reflects not a singular lapse in judgment, but a pattern of obstruction and disregard for legal transparency. Such behavior—when committed by the Iowa Attorney General’s Office—endangers public trust in the State of Iowa’s commitment to law enforcement integrity and open government. It also violates this agency’s leadership’s ethical obligations under the Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct.
The actions and omissions by the Iowa Attorney General’s Office—particularly in the correspondence from Cindy Glick (Attachment 3)—constitute a failure to uphold the ethical and legal responsibilities outlined in Chapter 32. Specifically, the refusal to meaningfully acknowledge or investigate credible evidence of discriminatory behavior by Erika Eckley, Executive Director of the Iowa Public Information Board, raises serious concerns under Rules 32:8.3(a), 32:8.4(a), and 32:8.4(g).
The Attorney General’s Office holds a heightened duty—not only to prosecute crimes and defend the state—but to ensure its attorneys maintain the standards of justice and professional ethics they are sworn to uphold. The failure to act upon well-documented evidence of discriminatory rhetoric contributes to a broader pattern of legal minimization, reputational protectionism, and institutional evasion.
This is not a matter of differing legal interpretation. It is a matter of civil rights accountability, professional responsibility, and the foundational promise of equal protection under the law.
VI. CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the conduct of Attorney General Brenna Bird presents a compelling case of professional misconduct under the Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct. The Board should give this matter full consideration. It implicates the integrity of the Iowa Court, the professional standards of its licensed legal community, and the Iowa Court’s commitment to protecting the public’s right to basic civil and constitutional rights protections.
The Iowa Supreme Court has communicated regarding Iowa Code Chapter 22 “The purpose of the statute is to open the doors of government to public scrutiny [and] to prevent government from secreting its decision-making activities from the public, on whose behalf it is its duty to act.” ’ ”Diercks, 806 N.W.2d at 652 (quoting Rathmann v. Bd. of Dirs., 580 N.W.2d 773, 777 (Iowa 1998)). “ ‘Accordingly, there is a presumption of openness and disclosure under this chapter.’ ” Id. (quoting Gabrilson v. Flynn, 554 N.W.2d 267, 271 (Iowa 1996)). The historical evidence supports that Attorney General Brenna Bird’s actions are not only in violation of the Iowa Code and the Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct, but they are in complete contrast to the spirit of government transparency.
Moreover, Attorney General Brenna Bird’s failure to uphold ethical transparency as required by Iowa Code Chapter 22 reflects not only upon themselves and the office they represent, but also upon the Iowa Court’s standards in granting licensure to practice law in this state. The public nature of this misconduct, if left unaddressed, threatens to erode public trust and confidence not only in the Iowa Judicial Branch’s ability to self-regulate, but also the Iowa Attorney General’s commitment to proper law enforcement.
The gravity of this matter demands more than dismissal—it requires discipline, reform, and the restoration of trust in the institutions charged with protecting our liberties.
The Form of the Iowa Judicial Branch Licensed Gaslit Reality Distortion Field
A form of unethical rhetoric practiced or enabled by licensed attorneys of the Iowa Judicial Branch, characterized by misrepresentation, intentional ambiguity, and strategic omissions(See Iowa Rules of the Court §§ 32:4.1(a), 32:8.4(c))—with the malicious or willfully negligent intent of distorting the recipient’s perception and understanding of reality.
Simultaneously, it functions to damage, obstruct, or delay(See Iowa Rules of the Court § 32:4.4(a)) the individual’s access to rights, liberties, and lawful remedies.
At the same time, unethical actors within the Iowa Judicial Branch’s licensed community serve to enable and manifest the state’s corruption, authoritarianism, and tyranny—all under the cloak of bureaucratic procedure.
I certify under penalty of perjury and pursuant to the laws of the state of Iowa that the preceding is true and correct.
Respectfully submitted,
By: /s/ Michael J. Merritt Michael J. Merritt Founder, Cipher Hunter 2510 S 6th St. D24 Marshalltown, IA 50158 Telephone: (641)-387-9935 Email: pyrebird@phoenixharbor.net Pro Se for Cipher Hunter
Assistant Attorney General Dan Breitbarth, Respondent.
Case No.: Pending Assignment
DECLARATION AND EVIDENCE OF ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT — ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL DAN BREITBARTH
COMES NOW Pro Se Michael J. Merritt for Complainant Cipher Hunter, in this matter before the Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board. Respectfully requesting review of the below testimony and evidence in accordance with Iowa Rules of the Court Chapters 32 and 35.
I. PARTIES
Petitioner, Cipher Hunter, is a civic transparency and records research initiative focused on the protection of civil liberties and governmental accountability registered in Marshall County, Iowa, and managed by Michael J. Merritt. Mr. Merritt is a retired U.S. Navy veteran, information warfare specialist, and public records researcher. He is also an advocate for domestic violence survivors, individuals living with mental health disabilities, and veterans affected by military sexual trauma (MST).
Respondent Assistant Attorney General Dan Breitbarth is a deputy attorney general within the State of Iowa Attorney General’s office.
II. CAUSE OF ACTION
Multiple alleged violations of the Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct stem from a unified sequence of factual events. To maintain legal sufficiency for each rule cited, overlapping facts appear where necessary to establish each violation in isolation.
32:8.4(d) — “engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice;” — Under the leadership of Assistant Attorney General Dan Breitbarth, the evidence supports that the Iowa Attorney General’s Office disregarded a public records request (See Attachment 4).
32:8.4(d) — “engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice;” — Under the leadership of Assistant Attorney General Dan Breitbarth, the evidence supports that the Iowa Attorney General’s Office disregarded a public records request related to evidence of the State of Iowa’s inter-agency acts of service-connected mental health disability discrimination (See Attachment 5).
32:8.4(d) — “engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice;” — Under the leadership of Assistant Attorney General Dan Breitbarth, the evidence supports that the Iowa Attorney General’s Office disregarded a public records request related to evidence supporting Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds’ office and Jasper County, IA’s disregard of a public records request submitted during 2024 pursuant to Iowa Code § 22.4(2) (See Attachment 6).
32:8.4(d) — “engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice;” — Under the leadership of Assistant Attorney General Dan Breitbarth, the evidence supports that the Iowa Attorney General’s Office disregarded a public records request related to evidence of the State of Iowa’s inter-agency acts of service-connected mental health disability discrimination (See Attachment 8).
32:3.4(a) — “unlawfully obstruct another party’s access to evidence or unlawfully alter, destroy, or conceal a document or other material having potential evidentiary value. A lawyer shall not counsel or assist another person to do any such act;” — Under the leadership of Assistant Attorney General Dan Breitbarth, the evidence supports that the Iowa Attorney General’s Office disregarded a public records request related to evidence of the State of Iowa’s inter-agency acts of service-connected mental health disability discrimination (See Attachment 5).
32:3.4(a) — “unlawfully obstruct another party’s access to evidence or unlawfully alter, destroy, or conceal a document or other material having potential evidentiary value. A lawyer shall not counsel or assist another person to do any such act;” — Under the leadership of Assistant Attorney General Dan Breitbarth, the evidence supports that the Iowa Attorney General’s Office disregarded a public records request related to evidence supporting Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds’ office and Jasper County, IA’s disregard of a public records request submitted during 2024 pursuant to Iowa Code § 22.4(2) (See Attachment 6).
32:3.4(a) — “unlawfully obstruct another party’s access to evidence or unlawfully alter, destroy, or conceal a document or other material having potential evidentiary value. A lawyer shall not counsel or assist another person to do any such act;” — Under the leadership of Assistant Attorney General Dan Breitbarth, the evidence supports that the Iowa Attorney General’s Office disregarded a public records request related to evidence of the State of Iowa’s inter-agency acts of service-connected mental health disability discrimination (See Attachment 8).
32:4.4(a) — “In representing a client, a lawyer shall not use means that have no substantial purpose other than to embarrass, delay, or burden a third person, or use methods of obtaining evidence that violate the legal rights of such a person.” — Under the leadership of Assistant Attorney General Dan Breitbarth, the evidence supports that the Iowa Attorney General’s Office disregarded a public records request (See Attachment 4).
32:4.4(a) — “In representing a client, a lawyer shall not use means that have no substantial purpose other than to embarrass, delay, or burden a third person, or use methods of obtaining evidence that violate the legal rights of such a person.” — Under the leadership of Assistant Attorney General Dan Breitbarth, the evidence supports that the Iowa Attorney General’s Office disregarded a public records request related to evidence of the State of Iowa’s inter-agency acts of service-connected mental health disability discrimination (See Attachment 5).
32:4.4(a) — “In representing a client, a lawyer shall not use means that have no substantial purpose other than to embarrass, delay, or burden a third person, or use methods of obtaining evidence that violate the legal rights of such a person.” — Under the leadership of Assistant Attorney General Dan Breitbarth, the evidence supports that the Iowa Attorney General’s Office disregarded a public records request related to evidence supporting Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds’ office and Jasper County, IA’s disregard of a public records request submitted during 2024 pursuant to Iowa Code § 22.4(2) (See Attachment 6).
32:4.4(a) — “In representing a client, a lawyer shall not use means that have no substantial purpose other than to embarrass, delay, or burden a third person, or use methods of obtaining evidence that violate the legal rights of such a person.” — Under the leadership of Assistant Attorney General Dan Breitbarth, the evidence supports that the Iowa Attorney General’s Office disregarded a public records request related to evidence of the State of Iowa’s inter-agency acts of service-connected mental health disability discrimination (See Attachment 8).
32:8.4(g) — “engage in sexual harassment or other unlawful discrimination in the practice of law or knowingly permit staff or agents subject to the lawyer’s direction and control to do so.” — Under the leadership of Assistant Attorney General Dan Breitbarth, the evidence supports that the Iowa Attorney General’s Office disregarded several public records requests related to evidence of the State of Iowa’s inter-agency acts of service-connected mental health disability discrimination (See Attachments 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8).
32:8.4(a) — “violate or attempt to violate the Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the acts of another;” — This complaint alleges Assistant Attorney General Dan Breitbarth has produced evidence supporting twelve individual violations of the Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct as supported by the testimony and evidence within this complaint. A final complaint will be submitted upon the completion of the Complainant’s statewide investigation and the conclusion of a future Iowa Court case against the Iowa Public Information Board.
The following section provides a factual timeline and documentation supporting the violations outlined above.
III. FACTS AND BACKGROUND
The following timeline of evidence supports the conclusion that Assistant Attorney General Dan Breitbarth violated sections of the Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct outlined in Section II of this complaint.
Timeline of Events
Each of the following events corresponds to a documented attachment and supports the foundation for the alleged Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct violations outlined in Section II.
09 NOV 2022 — Upon the Iowa Public Information Board tabling former Iowa Public Information Board Executive Director Johnson’s 11 OCT 2022 dismissal, it was determined that Facebook block lists “belonging to… any county….” are public records in the State of Iowa. (See Attachment 1, Memorandum — Iowa Public Information Board — Revised Dismissal — 09 NOV 2022).
11 AUG 2023 — Kristi Harshbarger of the Iowa State Association of Counties communicated to the Iowa Attorney General’s office, “Good afternoon: I talked to Erika Eckley with IPIB this afternoon. She received 35 complaints from Michael Merritt last night and so she is reaching out to us, the League, and IASB, as she would like to discuss this issue with her board next Thursday the 17th and is encouraging local governments that have concerns/ideas on how to handle Mr. Merritt’s requests to come speak at the public comment portion at the beginning of the meeting (meeting is at 1:00). I think she would like to try to get some guidance for local governments and is trying to strike a balance between Chapter 22 and the needs of local governments (resources, IT security, etc). I know both ICIT and ICAA have had some informal conversations among their members about these requests — if either of you are aware of counties that might like to comment at this meeting, could you please contact them or let me know who to contact? Thank you! Kristi” (See Electronic Mail — Iowa State Association of Counties — Kristi Harshbarger — 11 AUG 2023).
14 AUG 2023 — Cindy Glick of the Iowa Attorney General’s Office forwarded an email from Kristi Harshbarger to a Legislative Committee regarding an intercounty teleconference regarding public records requests submitted by the Complainant, “Hi—Here is the call-in info—Dial-in number: 877-304-9269 Conference Code: 664760# Thanks! Kristi” (See Electronic Mail — Iowa Attorney General’s Office — Cindy Glick — 14 AUG 2023).
22 JAN 2025 — Public records requests submitted pursuant to Iowa Code § 22.4(2) related to the Iowa Attorney General’s Facebook Page Block List (See Electronic Mail — Michael J Merritt — 22 JAN 2025).
31 JAN 2025 — Public records request submitted pursuant to Iowa Code § 22.4(2) requesting evidence of the Iowa Attorney General’s involvement in alleged discriminatory acts by IPIB Executive Director Erika Eckley’s alleged statewide discrimination against service-connected mental health-based disabilities (See Electronic Mail — Michael J Merritt — 31 JAN 2025; see also ISCADB Complaint — Erika Eckley — 25 JUN 2025).
05 JUN 2025 — Public records request submitted pursuant to Iowa Code § 22.4(2) requesting evidence of a statewide transmitted public records request that evidence indicates Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds and Jasper County, IA, disregarded during 2024 (See Electronic Mail — Michael J Merritt — 05 JUN 2025).
10 JUN 2025 — Iowa Office of Civil Rights issued a Right to Sue memorandum for Michael J. Merritt v. Iowa Public Information Board (See MM RTS).
12 JUN 2025 — Public records request sent to Daniel Barnes — Deputy Attorney General, Jeffrey Peterzalek — Deputy Attorney General, Edward Bull— Deputy Attorney General, Susan Krisko — Deputy Attorney General, Eric Wessan — Deputy Attorney General, Leif Olson — Deputy Attorney General, and Dan Breitbarth — Assistant Attorney General 3/Former Board, Commission, Council pursuant to Iowa Code § 22.4(2) requesting evidence of the Iowa Attorney General’s involvement in alleged discriminatory acts by IPIB Executive Director Erika Eckley’s alleged statewide discrimination against service-connected mental health-based disabilities (See Electronic Mail — Michael J Merritt — 12 JUN 2025).
13 JUN 2025 — Iowa Attorney General’s response to Attachment 8 (See Electronic Mail — Iowa Attorney General — 13 JUN 2025).
16 JUN 2025 — Complainant’s response to Attachment 9 (See Electronic Mail — Michael J Merritt — 16 JUN 2025).
06 JUL 2025 — Evidence supporting that Facebook Page “Office of the Attorney General of Iowa (Attorney General Brenna Bird)” (https://www.facebook.com/AGIowa/) is a Facebook Page belonging to the State of Iowa (See Screenshot — facebook-com-agiowa — 6-7-2025_15114).
06 JUL 2025 — Evidence supporting the official social media profiles for the Office of the Attorney General’s Office of the State of Iowa (See Screenshot — iowaattorneygeneral-gov — 6-7-2025_1508).
IV. ATTACHMENTS
Memorandum — Iowa Public Information Board — Revised Dismissal — 09 NOV 2022
Electronic Mail — Iowa State Association of Counties — Kristi Harshbarger — 11 AUG 2023
Electronic Mail — Iowa Attorney General’s Office — Cindy Glick — 14 AUG 2023
Electronic Mail — Michael J Merritt — 22 JAN 2025
Electronic Mail — Michael J Merritt — 31 JAN 2025
Electronic Mail — Michael J Merritt — 05 JUN 2025
MM RTS — 10 JUN 2025
Electronic Mail — Michael J Merritt — 12 JUN 2025
Electronic Mail — Iowa Attorney General — 13 JUN 2025
The evidence presented in this complaint supports multiple violations of the Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct. These violations are not hypothetical—they are grounded in public communications, official correspondence, and a clearly documented timeline. Assistant Attorney General Dan Breitbarth’s failure to release lawful public records pursuant to Iowa Code Chapter 22, combined with the evidence supporting the Attorney General’s Office’s role in inter-agency acts of disability-based discrimination, contributed to procedural obstruction, emotional harm, denial of rights, and violations of statutory protections under Iowa Code Chapters 22 and 216.
Taken together, this conduct reflects not a singular lapse in judgment, but a pattern of obstruction and disregard for legal transparency. Such behavior—when committed by the Iowa Attorney General’s Office—endangers public trust in the State of Iowa’s commitment to law enforcement integrity and open government. It also violates this agency’s leadership’s ethical obligations under the Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct.
The actions and omissions by the Iowa Attorney General’s Office—particularly in the correspondence from Cindy Glick (Attachment 3)—constitute a failure to uphold the ethical and legal responsibilities outlined in Chapter 32. Specifically, the refusal to meaningfully acknowledge or investigate credible evidence of discriminatory behavior by Erika Eckley, Executive Director of the Iowa Public Information Board, raises serious concerns under Rules 32:8.3(a), 32:8.4(a), and 32:8.4(g).
The Attorney General’s Office holds a heightened duty—not only to prosecute crimes and defend the state—but to ensure its attorneys maintain the standards of justice and professional ethics they are sworn to uphold. The failure to act upon well-documented evidence of discriminatory rhetoric contributes to a broader pattern of legal minimization, reputational protectionism, and institutional evasion.
This is not a matter of differing legal interpretation. It is a matter of civil rights accountability, professional responsibility, and the foundational promise of equal protection under the law.
VI. CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the conduct of Assistant Attorney General Dan Breitbarth presents a compelling case of professional misconduct under the Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct. The Board should give this matter full consideration. It implicates the integrity of the Iowa Court, the professional standards of its licensed legal community, and the Iowa Court’s commitment to protecting the public’s right to basic civil and constitutional rights protections.
The Iowa Supreme Court has communicated regarding Iowa Code Chapter 22 “The purpose of the statute is to open the doors of government to public scrutiny [and] to prevent government from secreting its decision-making activities from the public, on whose behalf it is its duty to act.” ’ ”Diercks, 806 N.W.2d at 652 (quoting Rathmann v. Bd. of Dirs., 580 N.W.2d 773, 777 (Iowa 1998)). “ ‘Accordingly, there is a presumption of openness and disclosure under this chapter.’ ” Id. (quoting Gabrilson v. Flynn, 554 N.W.2d 267, 271 (Iowa 1996)). The historical evidence supports that Assistant Attorney General Dan Breitbarth’s actions are not only in violation of the Iowa Code and the Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct, but they are in complete contrast to the spirit of government transparency.
Moreover, Assistant Attorney General Dan Breitbarth’s failure to uphold ethical transparency as required by Iowa Code Chapter 22 reflects not only upon themselves and the office they represent, but also upon the Iowa Court’s standards in granting licensure to practice law in this state. The public nature of this misconduct, if left unaddressed, threatens to erode public trust and confidence not only in the Iowa Judicial Branch’s ability to self-regulate, but also the Iowa Attorney General’s commitment to proper law enforcement.
The gravity of this matter demands more than dismissal—it requires discipline, reform, and the restoration of trust in the institutions charged with protecting our liberties.
The Form of the Iowa Judicial Branch Licensed Gaslit Reality Distortion Field
A form of unethical rhetoric practiced or enabled by licensed attorneys of the Iowa Judicial Branch, characterized by misrepresentation, intentional ambiguity, and strategic omissions(See Iowa Rules of the Court §§ 32:4.1(a), 32:8.4(c))—with the malicious or willfully negligent intent of distorting the recipient’s perception and understanding of reality.
Simultaneously, it functions to damage, obstruct, or delay(See Iowa Rules of the Court § 32:4.4(a)) the individual’s access to rights, liberties, and lawful remedies.
At the same time, unethical actors within the Iowa Judicial Branch’s licensed community serve to enable and manifest the state’s corruption, authoritarianism, and tyranny—all under the cloak of bureaucratic procedure.
I certify under penalty of perjury and pursuant to the laws of the state of Iowa that the preceding is true and correct.
Respectfully submitted,
By: /s/ Michael J. Merritt Michael J. Merritt Founder, Cipher Hunter 2510 S 6th St. D24 Marshalltown, IA 50158 Telephone: (641)-387-9935 Email: pyrebird@phoenixharbor.net Pro Se for Cipher Hunter
DECLARATION AND EVIDENCE OF ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT — DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL LEIF OLSON
COMES NOW Pro Se Michael J. Merritt for Complainant Cipher Hunter, in this matter before the Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board. Respectfully requesting review of the below testimony and evidence in accordance with Iowa Rules of the Court Chapters 32 and 35.
I. PARTIES
Petitioner, Cipher Hunter, is a civic transparency and records research initiative focused on the protection of civil liberties and governmental accountability registered in Marshall County, Iowa, and managed by Michael J. Merritt. Mr. Merritt is a retired U.S. Navy veteran, information warfare specialist, and public records researcher. He is also an advocate for domestic violence survivors, individuals living with mental health disabilities, and veterans affected by military sexual trauma (MST).
Respondent Deputy Attorney General Leif Olson is a deputy attorney general within the State of Iowa Attorney General’s office.
II. CAUSE OF ACTION
Multiple alleged violations of the Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct stem from a unified sequence of factual events. To maintain legal sufficiency for each rule cited, overlapping facts appear where necessary to establish each violation in isolation.
32:8.4(d) — “engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice;” — Under the leadership of Deputy Attorney General Leif Olson, the evidence supports that the Iowa Attorney General’s Office disregarded a public records request (See Attachment 4).
32:8.4(d) — “engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice;” — Under the leadership of Deputy Attorney General Leif Olson, the evidence supports that the Iowa Attorney General’s Office disregarded a public records request related to evidence of the State of Iowa’s inter-agency acts of service-connected mental health disability discrimination (See Attachment 5).
32:8.4(d) — “engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice;” — Under the leadership of Deputy Attorney General Leif Olson, the evidence supports that the Iowa Attorney General’s Office disregarded a public records request related to evidence supporting Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds’ office and Jasper County, IA’s disregard of a public records request submitted during 2024 pursuant to Iowa Code § 22.4(2) (See Attachment 6).
32:8.4(d) — “engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice;” — Under the leadership of Deputy Attorney General Leif Olson, the evidence supports that the Iowa Attorney General’s Office disregarded a public records request related to evidence of the State of Iowa’s inter-agency acts of service-connected mental health disability discrimination (See Attachment 8).
32:3.4(a) — “unlawfully obstruct another party’s access to evidence or unlawfully alter, destroy, or conceal a document or other material having potential evidentiary value. A lawyer shall not counsel or assist another person to do any such act;” — Under the leadership of Deputy Attorney General Leif Olson, the evidence supports that the Iowa Attorney General’s Office disregarded a public records request related to evidence of the State of Iowa’s inter-agency acts of service-connected mental health disability discrimination (See Attachment 5).
32:3.4(a) — “unlawfully obstruct another party’s access to evidence or unlawfully alter, destroy, or conceal a document or other material having potential evidentiary value. A lawyer shall not counsel or assist another person to do any such act;” — Under the leadership of Deputy Attorney General Leif Olson, the evidence supports that the Iowa Attorney General’s Office disregarded a public records request related to evidence supporting Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds’ office and Jasper County, IA’s disregard of a public records request submitted during 2024 pursuant to Iowa Code § 22.4(2) (See Attachment 6).
32:3.4(a) — “unlawfully obstruct another party’s access to evidence or unlawfully alter, destroy, or conceal a document or other material having potential evidentiary value. A lawyer shall not counsel or assist another person to do any such act;” — Under the leadership of Deputy Attorney General Leif Olson, the evidence supports that the Iowa Attorney General’s Office disregarded a public records request related to evidence of the State of Iowa’s inter-agency acts of service-connected mental health disability discrimination (See Attachment 8).
32:4.4(a) — “In representing a client, a lawyer shall not use means that have no substantial purpose other than to embarrass, delay, or burden a third person, or use methods of obtaining evidence that violate the legal rights of such a person.” — Under the leadership of Deputy Attorney General Leif Olson, the evidence supports that the Iowa Attorney General’s Office disregarded a public records request (See Attachment 4).
32:4.4(a) — “In representing a client, a lawyer shall not use means that have no substantial purpose other than to embarrass, delay, or burden a third person, or use methods of obtaining evidence that violate the legal rights of such a person.” — Under the leadership of Deputy Attorney General Leif Olson, the evidence supports that the Iowa Attorney General’s Office disregarded a public records request related to evidence of the State of Iowa’s inter-agency acts of service-connected mental health disability discrimination (See Attachment 5).
32:4.4(a) — “In representing a client, a lawyer shall not use means that have no substantial purpose other than to embarrass, delay, or burden a third person, or use methods of obtaining evidence that violate the legal rights of such a person.” — Under the leadership of Deputy Attorney General Leif Olson, the evidence supports that the Iowa Attorney General’s Office disregarded a public records request related to evidence supporting Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds’ office and Jasper County, IA’s disregard of a public records request submitted during 2024 pursuant to Iowa Code § 22.4(2) (See Attachment 6).
32:4.4(a) — “In representing a client, a lawyer shall not use means that have no substantial purpose other than to embarrass, delay, or burden a third person, or use methods of obtaining evidence that violate the legal rights of such a person.” — Under the leadership of Deputy Attorney General Leif Olson, the evidence supports that the Iowa Attorney General’s Office disregarded a public records request related to evidence of the State of Iowa’s inter-agency acts of service-connected mental health disability discrimination (See Attachment 8).
32:8.4(g) — “engage in sexual harassment or other unlawful discrimination in the practice of law or knowingly permit staff or agents subject to the lawyer’s direction and control to do so.” — Under the leadership of Deputy Attorney General Leif Olson, the evidence supports that the Iowa Attorney General’s Office disregarded several public records requests related to evidence of the State of Iowa’s inter-agency acts of service-connected mental health disability discrimination (See Attachments 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8).
32:8.4(a) — “violate or attempt to violate the Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the acts of another;” — This complaint alleges Deputy Attorney General Leif Olson has produced evidence supporting twelve individual violations of the Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct as supported by the testimony and evidence within this complaint. A final complaint will be submitted upon the completion of the Complainant’s statewide investigation and the conclusion of a future Iowa Court case against the Iowa Public Information Board.
The following section provides a factual timeline and documentation supporting the violations outlined above.
III. FACTS AND BACKGROUND
The following timeline of evidence supports the conclusion that Deputy Attorney General Leif Olson violated sections of the Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct outlined in Section II of this complaint.
Timeline of Events
Each of the following events corresponds to a documented attachment and supports the foundation for the alleged Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct violations outlined in Section II.
09 NOV 2022 — Upon the Iowa Public Information Board tabling former Iowa Public Information Board Executive Director Johnson’s 11 OCT 2022 dismissal, it was determined that Facebook block lists “belonging to… any county….” are public records in the State of Iowa. (See Attachment 1, Memorandum — Iowa Public Information Board — Revised Dismissal — 09 NOV 2022).
11 AUG 2023 — Kristi Harshbarger of the Iowa State Association of Counties communicated to the Iowa Attorney General’s office, “Good afternoon: I talked to Erika Eckley with IPIB this afternoon. She received 35 complaints from Michael Merritt last night and so she is reaching out to us, the League, and IASB, as she would like to discuss this issue with her board next Thursday the 17th and is encouraging local governments that have concerns/ideas on how to handle Mr. Merritt’s requests to come speak at the public comment portion at the beginning of the meeting (meeting is at 1:00). I think she would like to try to get some guidance for local governments and is trying to strike a balance between Chapter 22 and the needs of local governments (resources, IT security, etc). I know both ICIT and ICAA have had some informal conversations among their members about these requests — if either of you are aware of counties that might like to comment at this meeting, could you please contact them or let me know who to contact? Thank you! Kristi” (See Electronic Mail — Iowa State Association of Counties — Kristi Harshbarger — 11 AUG 2023).
14 AUG 2023 — Cindy Glick of the Iowa Attorney General’s Office forwarded an email from Kristi Harshbarger to a Legislative Committee regarding an intercounty teleconference regarding public records requests submitted by the Complainant, “Hi—Here is the call-in info—Dial-in number: 877-304-9269 Conference Code: 664760# Thanks! Kristi” (See Electronic Mail — Iowa Attorney General’s Office — Cindy Glick — 14 AUG 2023).
22 JAN 2025 — Public records requests submitted pursuant to Iowa Code § 22.4(2) related to the Iowa Attorney General’s Facebook Page Block List (See Electronic Mail — Michael J Merritt — 22 JAN 2025).
31 JAN 2025 — Public records request submitted pursuant to Iowa Code § 22.4(2) requesting evidence of the Iowa Attorney General’s involvement in alleged discriminatory acts by IPIB Executive Director Erika Eckley’s alleged statewide discrimination against service-connected mental health-based disabilities (See Electronic Mail — Michael J Merritt — 31 JAN 2025; see also ISCADB Complaint — Erika Eckley — 25 JUN 2025).
05 JUN 2025 — Public records request submitted pursuant to Iowa Code § 22.4(2) requesting evidence of a statewide transmitted public records request that evidence indicates Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds and Jasper County, IA, disregarded during 2024 (See Electronic Mail — Michael J Merritt — 05 JUN 2025).
10 JUN 2025 — Iowa Office of Civil Rights issued a Right to Sue memorandum for Michael J. Merritt v. Iowa Public Information Board (See MM RTS).
12 JUN 2025 — Public records request sent to Daniel Barnes — Deputy Attorney General, Jeffrey Peterzalek — Deputy Attorney General, Edward Bull— Deputy Attorney General, Susan Krisko — Deputy Attorney General, Eric Wessan — Deputy Attorney General, Leif Olson — Deputy Attorney General, and Dan Breitbarth — Assistant Attorney General 3/Former Board, Commission, Council pursuant to Iowa Code § 22.4(2) requesting evidence of the Iowa Attorney General’s involvement in alleged discriminatory acts by IPIB Executive Director Erika Eckley’s alleged statewide discrimination against service-connected mental health-based disabilities (See Electronic Mail — Michael J Merritt — 12 JUN 2025).
13 JUN 2025 — Iowa Attorney General’s response to Attachment 8 (See Electronic Mail — Iowa Attorney General — 13 JUN 2025).
16 JUN 2025 — Complainant’s response to Attachment 9 (See Electronic Mail — Michael J Merritt — 16 JUN 2025).
06 JUL 2025 — Evidence supporting that Facebook Page “Office of the Attorney General of Iowa (Attorney General Brenna Bird)” (https://www.facebook.com/AGIowa/) is a Facebook Page belonging to the State of Iowa (See Screenshot — facebook-com-agiowa — 6-7-2025_15114).
06 JUL 2025 — Evidence supporting the official social media profiles for the Office of the Attorney General’s Office of the State of Iowa (See Screenshot — iowaattorneygeneral-gov — 6-7-2025_1508).
IV. ATTACHMENTS
Memorandum — Iowa Public Information Board — Revised Dismissal — 09 NOV 2022
Electronic Mail — Iowa State Association of Counties — Kristi Harshbarger — 11 AUG 2023
Electronic Mail — Iowa Attorney General’s Office — Cindy Glick — 14 AUG 2023
Electronic Mail — Michael J Merritt — 22 JAN 2025
Electronic Mail — Michael J Merritt — 31 JAN 2025
Electronic Mail — Michael J Merritt — 05 JUN 2025
MM RTS — 10 JUN 2025
Electronic Mail — Michael J Merritt — 12 JUN 2025
Electronic Mail — Iowa Attorney General — 13 JUN 2025
The evidence presented in this complaint supports multiple violations of the Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct. These violations are not hypothetical—they are grounded in public communications, official correspondence, and a clearly documented timeline. Deputy Attorney General Leif Olson’s failure to release lawful public records pursuant to Iowa Code Chapter 22, combined with the evidence supporting the Attorney General’s Office’s role in inter-agency acts of disability-based discrimination, contributed to procedural obstruction, emotional harm, denial of rights, and violations of statutory protections under Iowa Code Chapters 22 and 216.
Taken together, this conduct reflects not a singular lapse in judgment, but a pattern of obstruction and disregard for legal transparency. Such behavior—when committed by the Iowa Attorney General’s Office—endangers public trust in the State of Iowa’s commitment to law enforcement integrity and open government. It also violates this agency’s leadership’s ethical obligations under the Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct.
The actions and omissions by the Iowa Attorney General’s Office—particularly in the correspondence from Cindy Glick (Attachment 3)—constitute a failure to uphold the ethical and legal responsibilities outlined in Chapter 32. Specifically, the refusal to meaningfully acknowledge or investigate credible evidence of discriminatory behavior by Erika Eckley, Executive Director of the Iowa Public Information Board, raises serious concerns under Rules 32:8.3(a), 32:8.4(a), and 32:8.4(g).
The Attorney General’s Office holds a heightened duty—not only to prosecute crimes and defend the state—but to ensure its attorneys maintain the standards of justice and professional ethics they are sworn to uphold. The failure to act upon well-documented evidence of discriminatory rhetoric contributes to a broader pattern of legal minimization, reputational protectionism, and institutional evasion.
This is not a matter of differing legal interpretation. It is a matter of civil rights accountability, professional responsibility, and the foundational promise of equal protection under the law.
VI. CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the conduct of Deputy Attorney General Leif Olson presents a compelling case of professional misconduct under the Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct. The Board should give this matter full consideration. It implicates the integrity of the Iowa Court, the professional standards of its licensed legal community, and the Iowa Court’s commitment to protecting the public’s right to basic civil and constitutional rights protections.
The Iowa Supreme Court has communicated regarding Iowa Code Chapter 22 “The purpose of the statute is to open the doors of government to public scrutiny [and] to prevent government from secreting its decision-making activities from the public, on whose behalf it is its duty to act.” ’ ”Diercks, 806 N.W.2d at 652 (quoting Rathmann v. Bd. of Dirs., 580 N.W.2d 773, 777 (Iowa 1998)). “ ‘Accordingly, there is a presumption of openness and disclosure under this chapter.’ ” Id. (quoting Gabrilson v. Flynn, 554 N.W.2d 267, 271 (Iowa 1996)). The historical evidence supports that Deputy Attorney General Leif Olson’s actions are not only in violation of the Iowa Code and the Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct, but they are in complete contrast to the spirit of government transparency.
Moreover, Deputy Attorney General Leif Olson’s failure to uphold ethical transparency as required by Iowa Code Chapter 22 reflects not only upon themselves and the office they represent, but also upon the Iowa Court’s standards in granting licensure to practice law in this state. The public nature of this misconduct, if left unaddressed, threatens to erode public trust and confidence not only in the Iowa Judicial Branch’s ability to self-regulate, but also the Iowa Attorney General’s commitment to proper law enforcement.
The gravity of this matter demands more than dismissal—it requires discipline, reform, and the restoration of trust in the institutions charged with protecting our liberties.
The Form of the Iowa Judicial Branch Licensed Gaslit Reality Distortion Field
A form of unethical rhetoric practiced or enabled by licensed attorneys of the Iowa Judicial Branch, characterized by misrepresentation, intentional ambiguity, and strategic omissions(See Iowa Rules of the Court §§ 32:4.1(a), 32:8.4(c))—with the malicious or willfully negligent intent of distorting the recipient’s perception and understanding of reality.
Simultaneously, it functions to damage, obstruct, or delay(See Iowa Rules of the Court § 32:4.4(a)) the individual’s access to rights, liberties, and lawful remedies.
At the same time, unethical actors within the Iowa Judicial Branch’s licensed community serve to enable and manifest the state’s corruption, authoritarianism, and tyranny—all under the cloak of bureaucratic procedure.
I certify under penalty of perjury and pursuant to the laws of the state of Iowa that the preceding is true and correct.
Respectfully submitted,
By: /s/ Michael J. Merritt Michael J. Merritt Founder, Cipher Hunter 2510 S 6th St. D24 Marshalltown, IA 50158 Telephone: (641)-387-9935 Email: pyrebird@phoenixharbor.net Pro Se for Cipher Hunter